Human Remains Curatorship: Ethical or Academic?

Human Remains Curatorsarticulatio coxae Ethical or donnish?AbstractBiological objections argon al bearings easily evoked the anyday associate of good issue, e supernumeraryly in pitying clay. And therefore, museum professionals should treat man mud dissimilarly and c arfully in curation.The public awareness of morals is changing from time to time. In the past tense, audiences did non solvent the look ups of gentle cadaver that are exhibited in museums, either with the gay bones or an collapse coffin of Egyptian mummies. In 1998, there was no public commentary was made for displaying the gay system of a medieval m other and youngster in Museum of capital of the United Kingdom, and no one disagreed that a museum curator displays gentless remain in a glass case would had a melody of work or would be invidious (Swain, 2002). So how do the museum professionals handle human trunk line of battles?Controversial topic of human corpse display in UK museumsThe collections of human clay in museums were becoming sensitive topics over the last 30 years beginning from Western countries (Jenkins, 2003). Museums in Australia and the North the States began to response to the repatriation demands about a decade ago, which was habituated a pressure in the UK or any other western countries to debate this topic in truth (Appleton, 2002). The focus of ethical concern on human ashes is chiefly associated with indigenous groups and social changes (Jenkins, 2011).capital of the United Kingdom Bodies order of battleThe Museum of London performed London Bodies exhibition in October 1998 to February 1999 (Swain, 2002). The aim of this exhibition was tracing the change of appearance of Londoners since prehistoric times by presented archaeological evidence from human skeletal remains which was drawn upon a very large collection about 18,000 human skeletons (Swain, 2002).The founding of London Bodies exhibition was involved a diverse group of specia lists including osteologists, curators, designers, press, PR staff and conservators, and also a squad of external consultants (Swain, 2002). The exhibition team took careful decisions on how to balance the respect for the human remains and the motivations for the exhibition as comfortably as the display tone-beginning (Curtis, 2003).The team put up three very clear warnings outside to go through citizenry noniced the warning before entering to the exhibition and did non allow children and school parties went into the exhibition without accompanying adults (Swain, 2002).Swain quoted a sales booth from Parker Pearsons paper Ethics and the demolitionly in British archeology that British responses to dead bodies are ambivalent, contradictory and inconsistent and is re newd to the way how the human remains are treated (Swain, 2002). Swain mentioned the views of London Bodies were conflict. almost of the views from university archaeologists were negative who had stand experien ce of working in North America or Australia where the cultural background of native people believe the dissonance of the dead is unacceptable and unethical (Swain, 2002) that Swain argued that people should non just follow a single set of standards for all human remains display with different cultural background (Swain, 2002). The visitor comments of London Bodies were mostly positive which was given a supporting figure to evidence that London society did not have a big problem with the display of human remains in an exhibition (Curtis, 2003).The Lindow gentleman exhibition at Manchester MuseumA 2,000 year old man at Lindow Moss secretive Wilmslow, Manchester, UK was discovered in 1984 who had suffered a violent death (Sitch, 2008). This discovery was provided singular evidence to archaeologists and forensic scientists about the life of people during the later(a) weightlift Age and early Roman period (Sitch, 2008).The recent exhibition of Lindow Man a Bog proboscis Mystery in The Manchester Museum was exhibited in April 2008 to April 2009. This was not the first time exhibition of Lindow Man at The Manchester Museum. on that pointfore, eight specially-selected contri neverthelessors proposed unused interpretations of Lindow Man in order to explore different meanings to different people (Sitch, 2008). The museum adopted a polyvocal approaching aiming to increase sensitivity towards human remains within society more generally by putting on board of a selection of some the finest Iron Age artefacts and personal items from the British Museum and the Manchester Museum collections, as well as speakers testimony from interviews. (Sitch, 2008).However, the polyvocal approach of displaying Lindow Man was aroused unexpected controversy (Sitch, 2008). Some visitors were confused by the polyvocal approach, they did not understand what the museum wanted to express and some visitors were disappointed of the advance(a) design and expressed that the innovative d esign was an insult to the ancient dead remains (Sitch, 2008).Stich concluded the experience of Lindow Man a Bog clay Mystery exhibition has brought some important lessons to the museum that is good for future reference point on how to curate human remains. Importance of public consultation and design review at the development process should be involved in planning an exhibition of human remains even though the donnish response of this exhibition was widely favorable (Sitch, 2008).Commercial human dust exhibitionsApart from the museum exhibitions of human remains, there is commercial message human frame exhibitions were emerged since the late 1990s. The original and famous human body exhibition is trunk Worlds. lugg get on with compartment Worlds is the original commercial travelling exhibitions of accepted human bodies round the valet de chambre which is formed by a German anatomist Gunther von Hagens.Gunther von Hagnes claimed that the primary mission of remains Worlds exhibition is health education, leading public audiences to have a fall apart understanding of their bodies and awareness of better health (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014). With displaying a numbers of real human specimens by his own preservation technique called plastination, including whole-body plastinates as well as individual organs, organ systems and transparent body slices in every single exhibition (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014).In addition to displaying body plastinates and organs, personify Worlds exhibition does also present some usual health teaching in an easily understood manner much(prenominal) as displaying healthy and frothing organs side by side for audiences to observe the difference (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014). They deliver a smoker lung alongside with a non-smoker lung to argue the difference between two organs in order to passing a content of healthy life. They also demonstrate the structure of artificial knee and hip joints to let the audiences to observe their function (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014).Art or Science?marvelous traditional human remains exhibitions in museums, the creation of body plastinates in tree trunk Worlds is diversified, in between art and science. The plastinated exhibits not only to face the structure of human body through various forms of anatomical presentation, from exhibiting whole-body plasinates to organs specimen in glass cases and body slices, but also prevail use of resilience of plastinated bodies to show the different posture of human activities such as dancing, runningetc. and also mimic some classical pose in famous movie such as Titanic Couple.Admittedly, the presentation of plastinated bodies in artistic way can reduce the fear of real human dead bodies displaying in front of the public and strengthen the interaction of the audiences and plastinated specimens, but also lead audiences generate an illusion that the specimen in the personate Worlds exh ibition are kinds of art.I criticise the presentation approach of corpse Worlds is contradicted to the primary mission of the exhibition which underscores health education and science. Referring to the visitor comments from frame Worlds ex officio websites and other public discussion boards, the visitor comments of Body Worlds are two poles but more on positive side. Positive comments are mostly focus on the displaying approach of specimens which is amazing art but do not get much information on health, epoch negative comments are concerning human bodies are commercialized and are not be respected.In 2011, Body Worlds the musical rhythm of animateness was held in matter Taiwan Science Education Center Museum Exhibitions. The aim of this exhibition was break the public about the beauty and fragility of the body, while The Cycle of Life focuses on the process of aging (Lin, 2011). However, some Taiwanese scholars argued that the whole presentation is an art, public cannot le arn anything about human body or start out any health messages from this exhibition, only with very simple explanation schoolbook on each specimen. It is not a science education..they emphasize education is just for hyping topic for earning admission fees by attracting more visitors commented by a Taiwanese professor of Medicine who was involved in Body Worlds Taipei exhibition in 2011 (Kuo, 2012).Another issue that was debated before the guanine opening of Body Worlds the Cycle of Life at Taipei in 2011 was the two sets of associationable plastinated specimens, which were planning to be displayed in the show. These two sets of sexual plastinated specimens were sparked controversy (Kuo, 2012). The debate was polarized, the supporting side argued that the exhibition is prohibited for age under 18 entry so there is no hurt for displaying something about sex the opponents refuted is the sexual display is only a convenience and questioned is there something inside so called educa tion of the sexual display? At the end of the discussion, the two sets of sexual plastinated specimens finally did not present in the exhibition (Kuo, 2012).Photo 1) a plastinated exhibit in Body Worlds the Cycle of Life, Taipei, 2011The photo is downloaded from National Taiwan Science Education Center official websiteThe founder of Body Worlds, Gunther von Hagens, who was born in East German and was in two years imprisonment by East German regime for political reasons (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014). His identity evokes the public sensible emotion of which to connect the terrible human experiments at East German in WWII (Kuo, 2012). Moreover, a bruit about the mention of plastinated bodies aroused suspicion and controversy.Question of bodies source? on that point was a pregnant char plastinated body exhibited in the show of Body Worlds the Cycle of Life in Asia. This plastinated specimen touched off a rumor in China regarding to the political struggle in communist P arty of China. This rumor also raised up a concern on human corpse source in human body shows around the world.Photo 2) Chinese pregnant woman at Body WorldsThe photo is downloaded from http//bodyworldspictures.blogspot.hk/The Chinese public suspected the young pregnant woman plastinated exhibit with mature fetus in the current Body Worlds show might belong to Zhang Weijie, a former mistress of the disgraced pol Bo Xilai who went missing ( module Reporter , 2012). Zhang Weijie was a well-known news reporter of Dalian Television. wad pointed out that the skull shape of pregnant woman exhibit looks like Zhang and the ratiocination together(p) mature embryo inside the body is not possible to be the result of an abortion (Staff Reporter , 2012).Some suspect that Gunther von Hagens had a special connection with Bo Xilai and therefore his had been set up his largest human body plastination pulverization in Dalian because Dalian government does not have any laws against the processing and export of corpses when Von Hagens was keeping a special relationship with the mayor of Dalian, Bo Xilai (Staff Reporter , 2012). There is another rumor that Dalian factory has been closed down since Bo Xilai has experienced his spectacular downfall in 2013. In 2008, ABC news reported a secret trade in Chines bodies which rose up a concern on the source of Chinese bodies was come from executed prisoners without consent (Ross, Brian Schwartz, Rhonda Schecter, Anna, 2008). In an interview on the ABC intelligence information program 20/20 with Von Hagnes, he dined all accusation and claimed that all Chinese bodies were given to him by a medical school in China to plastinate for doctrine models and he emphasized in the interview all Chinese bodies have never put on public display and the bodies from overseas were given by donors (Ross, Brian Schwartz, Rhonda Schecter, Anna, 2008).Public concerns on ethical issues Other than the controversy of the source of reinvigorated corpses, the human artwork in Body Worlds triggers a different moral stance on social and personal disputes. The dynamic expressions and body vocabulary, death seems to have become lyrical and poetic. The moral nature of death is expelled by art expressions triggers a discussion of human body whether or not should be treated in this way. Under the aura of health education in science and aesthetics, it is filled with the smell of commerce with interpretation promotional strategy (Kuo, 2012).Referring to Body Worlds official website, human plastinated specimens are purchasable on purchase (Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014). Although the company emphasizes the trade is only limited to competent users, this activity commercialise human specimens which are claimed to be collected by donors. Is this commercial trading activity has betrayed the original intention of donors?Although the exhibitions of plastinated bodies are controversial, a numbers of companies have been involved in the hug ely profitable shows since the late 1990s (Schwatrz, 2010).ConclusionHuman remains can reveal information about historic patterns of migration, lifestyle and disease said by Tiffany Jenkins (Jenkins, 2003). Issues concerning the lawfully state of body sources and ethical controversy about the use of human remains for public exhibitions have been emerged in museums, cultural authorities and commercial exhibition companies. Museums should take into consideration of different factors such as design, interpretation, management, knowledge and morality when planning new exhibitions regarding human remains.Public response to human remains exhibitions was mixed. Comparing to the case study of The London Bodies in The Museum of London and Lindow Man in The Museum of Manchester, museum audiences tend to accept the traditional approach of exhibiting human remains which is solemn, respectful, carefully treated and imitate the traditional burial mode. Conversely, museum audiences, especially th ose conservative visitors, dislike innovative approach exhibition of human remains. groundbreaking is easily to connected to dishonor, disgrace, affront and unethical. However, the interesting point from above stories is that visitors did not feel more antipathetic to Body Worlds exhibitions that allowed audiences to have a close contact with plastinated human remains which are made by fresh corpses, than The London Bodies exhibition in The Museum of London and Lindow Man exhibition with polyvocal approach in The Manchester museum.Although most people expect to see human remains in museums, with changing attitudes towards human remains in society, museum professionals need to brush up the display and treatment of human remains (Jenkins, 2011). However, the dividing line between adoption and unacceptance is difficult to define. This is a struggle between public morals and schoolman studies. Jenkins argued that it is very dangerous if the dividing line is inclined towards the mora l side, since human remains provide valuable material memory of past people and past times regarding human evidence, and benefit for today society such as informing changes in dental, surgical and medical practice (Jenkins, 2003). On the other hand, if we only emphasis on academic studies or education without considering ethical issues, such as the concern of the commercialise issue of human remains in Body Worlds, it will be dangerous too.Whatever the dividing line is inclined on either one side could result a profound impact. Therefore, balancing ethical concerns and academic studies may be a key for curating human remains. But what is an appropriate exhibition of human remains? There is no certain answer as the public reception is emotional and is changed by social values. This question would always be stalk museum curators.BibliographyAnon., 2011. Dr. Gunther von Hagens, Body Plastination at Body Worlds.. Online Available at http//bodyworldspictures.blogspot.hk/ Accessed 23 3 2014.Anon., 2011. National Taiwan Science Education Center. Online Available at http//www.ntsec.gov.tw/ drug user/Article.aspx?a=852 Accessed 24 3 2014.Appleton, J., 2002. Spiked Culture. Online Available at www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000006DB8A.htm Accessed 15 3 2014.Curtis, N., 2003. Human remains the sacred, museums and archaeology. Public Archaeology Vol. 3, pp. 21-32.Institute for Plastination, 2006-2014. Body Worlds. Online Available at http//www.bodyworlds.com/en.html Accessed 22 3 2014.Jenkins, T., 2003. Burying the evidence. Online Available at http//www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000006DFDE.htm Accessed 15 3 2014.Jenkins, T., 2011. Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections the contribution of a crisis of cultural authority. Online Available at http//www.materialworldblog.com/?s=contesting+human+remains+in+museum+collections Accessed 13 3 2014.Kuo, J.-K., 2012. Corporality and Boundary-work Museum Exhibitions of Real Human Bodies in Taiwan. Taiwan Museology qu arterly Vol. 26(3), 19 7, pp. 7-20.Lin, K., 2011. Highlight Body Worlds The Cycle of Life. Online Available at http//www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2011/07/01/2003507115 Accessed 22 3 2014.Ross, Brian Schwartz, Rhonda Schecter, Anna, 2008. Exclusive Secret duty in Chinese Bodies. Online Available at http//abcnews.go.com/Blotter/exclusive-secret-trade-chinese-bodies/story?id=4291334 Accessed 22 3 2014.Sitch, B., 2008. Courting controversy the Lindow Man exhibition at the Manchester Museum. UMAC Journal, 16th-20th 9.Staff Reporter , 2012. Netizens suggest Bo Xilais former mistress on display in Body Worlds. Online Available at http//www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120819000054cid=1101 Accessed 23 3 2014.Swain, H., 2002. The ethics of displaying human remains from British archaeological sites. Public Archaeology Vol. 2 , pp. 95-100.1