Systemic family therapy(psychotherapy) TEAM Essay

Systemic family therapy(psychotherapy) TEAM - Essay modelWithin the systems ascend, there are three different ways problems are approached, namely, the strategic approach, the morphological approach and the systemic approach. The strategic family therapist addresses problems in light of uncertain and inconsistent hierarchies within the family system (Watson n.d., p.381). He/she elicits power and control issues, and directs stir by means of family assignments or paradoxical injunctions (Haley 1976, Madanes 1981, cited in Watson n.d., p.381). A structural family therapist looks into family structure, subsystems, and boundaries with an ideal family structure in mind and tries to reorganize the boundaries of families. The systemic approach has its origin in the work of the Milan therapy team inspired by Mara Selvini Palazzoli along with L.Boscolo, G. Cecchin and G. Prata (Wright & Watson 1991, p.407). Systemic therapy involves conceptualization of family problems from a systemic pers pective, which plays an important role in the treatment process.Systemic therapists offer information and advice that liberate the family and enable them to crystallise their own problems. A systemic opinion is offered by conceptualizing the certifying symptom as a solution to close to other hypothetical or implied problem that would or could occur should the symptom not be present (Tomm, cited in Wright & Watson 1991, p.427). This is called reframing. ... They offer different and contradicting skylines of reality, referred to as split opinions, which enable the family to be more open to change (Wright & Watson 1991, p.428). Therapists require the family to follow a pattern of behavior that is different from what it is used to. This is referred to as a ritual. Rituals friend families to make new connections which in turn help them find new realities, leading to change and upshot of issues.The reflecting teamIn systemic family therapy, a reflecting team consisting of consultant s or co-therapists from different fields helps the family in purpose its own solution. The family is invited to sit behind a one-way mirror and observe the teams discussion on a previously held conversation between the family and the therapist. The teams voicing out aloud about the familys problems and possible solutions directs the family to consider tack together views of the family situation, problems and possible solutions.Andersen has suggested several assumptions and working guidelines for the reflecting team (cited in Jenkins 1996, p.1). A reflecting team follows the assumption that information unavoidably to shared and not withheld, and based on this, the team can share its thoughts with the family during discussions. When there are ternary ideas discussed, there are different perceptions of reality, and the familys perception of its situation is also enriched on hearing these differences. Consequently, the family gets an opportunity to view its problems and possible sol utions from alternate perspectives. These enriched pictures of the family and its dilemma form an ecology of ideas (Bogdan, cited in Jenkins 1996, p.1). Listening to the multitude of ideas and opinions of the reflecting team members helps the clients